The legal guides on this site cover questions people use to decide what they can and cannot do with a child's phone. This page explains how they are made, so you can judge how much to trust them.
They are written by the CatWatchful team. Authorship belongs to the company, not to an individual: we prefer that to inventing a personal byline or attributing them to a profile that does not answer for them.
That means a guide's credibility does not rest on whose name is on it, but on whether you can check what it says. Which is why the next point is the one that matters.
Each legal guide cites the specific articles it relies on — the code, the act and the article number — and links them to the official source in the relevant country, not to a third-party summary.
If a guide states that something is legal or illegal in Mexico, Colombia, Argentina or the United States, you will find the exact provision at the foot of the page so you can verify it yourself. That is the evidence we offer.
They are not legal advice, and no lawyer reviewed them. We say so plainly, because that is the difference between a useful guide and one that feigns an authority it does not have.
They are general information, organised and with the sources in plain view, so you can understand the framework and take your case to a professional if you need to. Each guide carries that notice at the foot.
Each guide shows the date it was last reviewed, and that same date is what we publish in the page's structured data. When a cited law changes, the guide and the date are updated.
If you see an old date, it is a real date, not decoration: we would rather you knew when it was last reviewed than show you today's date meaning nothing.
Write to admin@catwatchful.com naming the guide and the specific point. If the correction holds, the text is changed and the review date updated.